Re: refer to pointers as non-null

Hi Ted, Ted Unangst wrote on Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:33:05AM -0500: > Noticed this in wait.2, though I imagine other occurences abound. > > I believe non-null is clearer when refering to a pointer than non-zero, which > is a bit 80s, and less likely to be mistaken for the value pointed to. This

Re: refer to pointers as non-null

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:33:05AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Noticed this in wait.2, though I imagine other occurences abound. > > I believe non-null is clearer when refering to a pointer than non-zero, which > is a bit 80s, and less likely to be mistaken for the value pointed to. This > same pa

Re: refer to pointers as non-null

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 05:33:05AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote: > Noticed this in wait.2, though I imagine other occurences abound. > > I believe non-null is clearer when refering to a pointer than non-zero, which > is a bit 80s, and less likely to be mistaken for the value pointed to. This > same pa

refer to pointers as non-null

Noticed this in wait.2, though I imagine other occurences abound. I believe non-null is clearer when refering to a pointer than non-zero, which is a bit 80s, and less likely to be mistaken for the value pointed to. This same page also refers to non-zero values, fwiw. Index: wait.2 ==