> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 02:03:14 +
> From: Martin Brandenburg
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:16:13AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Would appreciate it if somebody could test this diff on a RT2790,
> > RT2860 or RT3090 variant. Shouldn't change anything for those
> > variants, but is necess
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:16:13AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Would appreciate it if somebody could test this diff on a RT2790,
> RT2860 or RT3090 variant. Shouldn't change anything for those
> variants, but is necessary to support some newer hardware.
I have tested on amd64 with
ral0
Would appreciate it if somebody could test this diff on a RT2790,
RT2860 or RT3090 variant. Shouldn't change anything for those
variants, but is necessary to support some newer hardware.
Thanks,
Mark
Index: rt2860.c
===
RCS file:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:07:09 +0100
Tim van der Molen wrote:
> I have the following ral(4):
>
> ral0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 5, address
> 00:1d:7d:49:28:92
> ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
>
> After a commit from August 2010 (see
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-
On Mar 10, Tim van der Molen wrote:
> I have the following ral(4):
>
> ral0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 5, address
> 00:1d:7d:49:28:92
> ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
>
> After a commit from August 2010 (see
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=128095139804862) th
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:07:09PM +0100, Tim van der Molen wrote:
> I have the following ral(4):
>
> ral0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 5, address
00:1d:7d:49:28:92
> ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
>
> After a commit from August 2010 (see
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-
I have the following ral(4):
ral0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "Ralink RT2561S" rev 0x00: irq 5, address
00:1d:7d:49:28:92
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2561C, RF RT2527
After a commit from August 2010 (see
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs&m=128095139804862) the ral stopped
working: clients could not associate wi
