9/23/23 14:11, Mark Kettenis пишет:
>> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:30:01 +
>> From: Klemens Nanni
>>
>> In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.upgrade's x bit,
>> powerpc64 rdboot just wants a regular file.
>>
>> Require and strip u+x before execution to prevent sysupgrade(8) loop.
Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Are there more reasons or benefits to this approach than a) less intrusive
> chmod() and b) more shared, overall less code?
>
> I obviously don't see the full picture (yet).
A normal bootloader only reads from disk.
No write occur.
The chmod hack is a write. In the li
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:35:40AM +, Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 02:26:18PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 01:11:32PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:30:01 +
> > > > From: Klemens Nanni
> > > >
> > > > In comparison
Visa Hankala wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 02:26:18PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 01:11:32PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:30:01 +
> > > > From: Klemens Nanni
> > > >
> > > > In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 02:26:18PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 01:11:32PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:30:01 +
> > > From: Klemens Nanni
> > >
> > > In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.upgrade's x bit,
> > > powerpc64 r
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 01:11:32PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:30:01 +
> > From: Klemens Nanni
> >
> > In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.upgrade's x bit,
> > powerpc64 rdboot just wants a regular file.
> >
> > Require and strip u+x before exec
> Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 22:30:01 +
> From: Klemens Nanni
>
> In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.upgrade's x bit,
> powerpc64 rdboot just wants a regular file.
>
> Require and strip u+x before execution to prevent sysupgrade(8) loop.
> I'm new to powerpc64 and can't think o
In comparison to MI boot which only cares about /bsd.upgrade's x bit,
powerpc64 rdboot just wants a regular file.
Require and strip u+x before execution to prevent sysupgrade(8) loop.
I'm new to powerpc64 and can't think of a reason to be different.
Feedback? Objection? OK?
Regular boot and sysu
