> On 14 Jun 2017, at 10:14 pm, Todd C. Miller wrote:
>
> This looks useful to me. Do you plan to do anything with the fails
> stats?
i dont think theyre that interesting to look at, and i was running out of space
for the things i thought were important in the systat view. on the other hand,
This looks useful to me. Do you plan to do anything with the fails
stats?
- todd
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 13:50 +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> i have a few things left to do in the pools per cpu caches, one of
> which is make their activity visibile. to that end, here's a diff
> provides a way for userland to request stats from the per cpu caches,
> and uses that in systat so you
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 13:50, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> i have a few things left to do in the pools per cpu caches, one of
> which is make their activity visibile. to that end, here's a diff
> provides a way for userland to request stats from the per cpu caches,
> and uses that in systat so you can
i have a few things left to do in the pools per cpu caches, one of
which is make their activity visibile. to that end, here's a diff
provides a way for userland to request stats from the per cpu caches,
and uses that in systat so you can watch them.
there are two added pool sysctls. one copies an