If I had to guess at this point - SRP may have a future.
I'm betting kssl does not, and this should probably go away.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 28. April 2014, 21:40:30 schrieb Ted Unangst:
>> Also note that I'm not really interested in rumors or whispe
Am Montag, 28. April 2014, 21:40:30 schrieb Ted Unangst:
> Also note that I'm not really interested in rumors or whispers. You
> don't need to tell me that it's possible somebody else uses
> Kerberos. I know it's possible, that's why I'm asking. I'd like to
> know who.
One data point: Apache HTTPD
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Hi there. I'm trying to find somebody who is actually using either
> Kerberos or SRP support in libssl. I'm inclined to remove support for
> them. While the bulk of the code sits off to the side, the integration
> requires adding several additional cases t
Hi there. I'm trying to find somebody who is actually using either
Kerberos or SRP support in libssl. I'm inclined to remove support for
them. While the bulk of the code sits off to the side, the integration
requires adding several additional cases to some of the most critical
paths.
For reference