Re: pfsync and policy routing states patch

2010-02-01 Thread Henning Brauer
* Romey Valadez [2010-01-15 00:53]: > this patch apply to OpenBSD v4.6 -stable we really don't care much for diffs to -stable. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootser

pfsync and policy routing states patch - version2

2010-01-20 Thread Romey Valadez
Hi tech@, here is a version 2 of the patch to correct the synchronization of states that use route-to policy, thanks to Bret Lambert for your patience to teach me and your suggestions. This patch apply to OpenBSD v4.6 -stable, nexthop_idx will give us the reference into the route pool that have a

pfsync and policy routing states patch

2010-01-18 Thread Romey Valadez
Hi All I'm testing this patch to permit synchronization of states that use route-to or reply-to for policy routing, this patch apply to OpenBSD v4.6 -stable, this is the problem: when pfsync send an state that uses route-to or reply-to option to the other machine, it only sends only current next-

pfsync and policy routing states patch

2010-01-14 Thread Romey Valadez
Hi All I'm testing this patch to permit synchronization of states that use route-to or reply-to for policy routing, this patch apply to OpenBSD v4.6 -stable, this is the problem: when pfsync send an state that uses route-to or reply-to option to the other machine, it only sends only current next-