Hello JCA,
thanks for the pointers.
> about this specific piece of code in pfctl, but the "kame hack" is still
> here and you really want to double check before removing such chunks in
...so pfctl is the wrong place to start with removal.
thanks and
regards
sashan
On Sun, May 03 2020, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Sashan,
> the question has popped up while on recent code review of some Solaris
> specific
> bug fixes: do we still need a code in diff below or is it OK to proceed
> and commit the diff?
>
> The chunk below uses bytes 2 and 3 to deri
Hello,
the question has popped up while on recent code review of some Solaris specific
bug fixes: do we still need a code in diff below or is it OK to proceed
and commit the diff?
The chunk below uses bytes 2 and 3 to derive a scope of link local address. It
seems to me those bytes/octets are al
