Hello,
>
> > As I've said I don't object your change. I agree it does,
> > what you intend, however I'm not sure how much it buys.
> My intention is to make warnings clear and unambiguous, such that
> referred table and anchor names can be copied and pasted into successive
> pfctl invoc
On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:27:18PM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> I don't object your change. However I hesitate to give OK too. I hope PF
> users, who have non-trivial rulesets will speak up here.
Feedback is welcome.
> IMO opinion we are hitting limitations of pfctl(8) here. Making warning
Hello,
I don't object your change. However I hesitate to give OK too. I hope PF
users, who have non-trivial rulesets will speak up here.
IMO opinion we are hitting limitations of pfctl(8) here. Making warnings
more useful requires to introduce some additional hints to pfctl, to
better express, w
Tables under different anchors may have the same name, but pfctl warns
about such scenarios upon table creation to avoid mixups. Unique and
descriptive names are highly recommended (for sanity).
# pfctl -T replace -t t1
1 table created.
no changes.
# pfctl -T repla
