On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:43:43AM +0100, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Side Note: I did quick check to RFCs. It seems to me there is a 'bug' in
> specification. RFC 2460 says:
>
>When more than one extension header is used in the same packet, it is
>recommended that those h
Hello,
> I found the link http://www.secfu.net/ in one of sthen@'s mails.
> There the author mentions that we accept IPv6 hop-by-hop headers
> after fragment headers. In fact this is a result of my pf fragment
> reassembly, so add an extra check there.
>
> ok?
I'm O.K. with it.
Side No
Hi,
I found the link http://www.secfu.net/ in one of sthen@'s mails.
There the author mentions that we accept IPv6 hop-by-hop headers
after fragment headers. In fact this is a result of my pf fragment
reassembly, so add an extra check there.
ok?
bluhm
Index: net/pf.c
==
