Hello,
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 06:40:12PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> sys/net/pf.c r1.968 added a call to m_print() #ifdef DDB in a
> troublesome situation.
>
> Once the root cause of the problem was fixed, the DDB-specific code path
> was removed in r1.970, but the added includes were kept, alth
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 06:40:12PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> sys/net/pf.c r1.968 added a call to m_print() #ifdef DDB in a
> troublesome situation.
>
> Once the root cause of the problem was fixed, the DDB-specific code path
> was removed in r1.970, but the added includes were kept, although
> n
sys/net/pf.c r1.968 added a call to m_print() #ifdef DDB in a
troublesome situation.
Once the root cause of the problem was fixed, the DDB-specific code path
was removed in r1.970, but the added includes were kept, although
nothing in pf.c depends on DDB anymore.
Index: pf.c
=
