On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> After discussing the issue with bluhm@ a better solution would be to
> unlink the state key before passing the mbuf to the driver. This way
> we would respect the contract that PF data structures are only accessed
> at IPL_SOFTNET.
Running >2 hours with your patch now and everything's fine.
As this is the longest splassert error free time frame in
the last 24 hours, i'd say -> fixed.
Thanks,
-Mark
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 07:33:49PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 11/01/17(Wed) 18:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > M
On 11 January 2017 at 19:33, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 11/01/17(Wed) 18:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
>> Mark Patruck reported the following assertion:
>>
>> splassert: pool_put: want 5 have 7
>> Starting stack trace...
>> pool_put() at pool_put+0x4e
>> pf_pkt_unlink_state_k
On 11/01/17(Wed) 18:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Mark Patruck reported the following assertion:
>
> splassert: pool_put: want 5 have 7
> Starting stack trace...
> pool_put() at pool_put+0x4e
> pf_pkt_unlink_state_key() at pf_pkt_unlink_state_key+0x15
> m_free() at m_
Mark Patruck reported the following assertion:
splassert: pool_put: want 5 have 7
Starting stack trace...
pool_put() at pool_put+0x4e
pf_pkt_unlink_state_key() at pf_pkt_unlink_state_key+0x15
m_free() at m_free+0xa0
m_freem() at m_freem+0x19
