On 17/02/21(Wed) 11:56, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below adds anon locking to the page daemon. It will become
> necessary to guarantee exclusive access to an anon as soon as the
> KERNEL_LOCK() is removed from the fault handler.
Anyone? This should have been part of the already committed anon
Diff below adds anon locking to the page daemon. It will become
necessary to guarantee exclusive access to an anon as soon as the
KERNEL_LOCK() is removed from the fault handler.
Comments? Oks?
Index: uvm/uvm_pdaemon.c
===
RCS file
