On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:43:31PM +0200, Tobias Stoeckmann wrote:
> - Check for our new /.// substitution expression
> - Be more restrictive about command parsing, so we do not
> allow commands like "10insert" instead of "10i".
And now, fix regression which I introduced with that diff, of cours
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:01:49PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> I think this is the correct approach. I've only taken a brief look
> so far but I think you should make write_lines() static in its
> declaration to match the prototype.
Thanks for pointing this out. Updated diff below:
- Make wri
I think this is the correct approach. I've only taken a brief look
so far but I think you should make write_lines() static in its
declaration to match the prototype.
- todd
Currently, patch calls /bin/ed to support ed-formatted diffs, which
means that patch needs to pledge proc and exec. As discussed, it would
be a huge benefit if we can remove that.
Our patch implementation and GNU patch are already very restrictive in
which patch lines are sent to ed, so don't expe
