On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:57:42AM -0500, Daniel Dickman wrote:
> > - (*t == 'a' || *t == 'c' || *t == 'd' || *t == 'i' || *t
> > == 's')) {
> > + strchr("acdis", *t) != NULL) {
>
>
> doesn't this change the semantics slightly? i haven't looked at the
> contex
Hi,
patch accepts arbitrary ed commands after encountering "s". The "s"
ed command does not expect any further input, which makes it a one line
command like "d". Yet, patch sends any lines until "." unchecked to ed
through its pipe, allowing command execution.
Example:
$ ls
ed.diff
$ cat ed.di
