On 06/21/15 21:21, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Brian Callahan writes:
>>
>>
>> On 06/21/15 19:56, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
>>> On 22.06.2015 01:55, Brian Callahan wrote:
This is quite obviously the wrong place to put any headers.
>>>
>>> It's odd, otherwise then the code should be refact
Brian Callahan writes:
>
>
> On 06/21/15 19:56, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> > On 22.06.2015 01:55, Brian Callahan wrote:
> >> This is quite obviously the wrong place to put any headers.
> >>
> >
> > It's odd, otherwise then the code should be refactored and the following
> > struct perhaps moved a
On 06/21/15 19:56, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> On 22.06.2015 01:55, Brian Callahan wrote:
>> This is quite obviously the wrong place to put any headers.
>>
>
> It's odd, otherwise then the code should be refactored and the following
> struct perhaps moved away, together with struct buffer?
>
> /*
On 22.06.2015 01:55, Brian Callahan wrote:
> This is quite obviously the wrong place to put any headers.
>
It's odd, otherwise then the code should be refactored and the following
struct perhaps moved away, together with struct buffer?
/*
* Previously from sysdef.h
* Only used in struct buffer
This is quite obviously the wrong place to put any headers.
On 06/21/15 19:41, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Caught on NetBSD.
>
> Index: def.h
> ===
>
>
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/def.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.147 diff -u -r1.147
Caught on NetBSD.
Index: def.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/mg/def.h,v
retrieving revision 1.147
diff -u -r1.147 def.h
--- def.h 3 Jun 2015 23:40:01 - 1.147
+++ def.h 21 Jun 2015 23:43:23 -
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @
