Re: ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-16 Thread Denis Fondras
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 04:07:11PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > unrelated to this diff: I wonder if the manpage (of both ospfd and pspf6d) > should mention that changing fib-priority with a reload is equivalent toa > uncouple/couple? > If I understand correctly what you mean, I don't think th

Re: ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-15 Thread Remi Locherer
reads good to me (but I did not test). On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 09:56:15AM +0100, Denis Fondras wrote: > > Index: kroute.c > === > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/kroute.c,v > retrieving revision 1.61 > diff -u -p -r1.61 kroute.c >

Re: ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-15 Thread Sebastian Benoit
reads ok. unrelated to this diff: I wonder if the manpage (of both ospfd and pspf6d) should mention that changing fib-priority with a reload is equivalent toa uncouple/couple? Denis Fondras(open...@ledeuns.net) on 2019.12.15 09:56:15 +0100: > > Index: kroute.c >

ospf6d: rework priority handling

2019-12-15 Thread Denis Fondras
Index: kroute.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ospf6d/kroute.c,v retrieving revision 1.61 diff -u -p -r1.61 kroute.c --- kroute.c12 Dec 2019 08:21:34 - 1.61 +++ kroute.c15 Dec 2019 08:42:10 - @@ -97,10 +97,11 @@