reads fine, and works for me in light testing.
OK phessler@
On 2017 Oct 30 (Mon) at 08:36:34 +0100 (+0100), Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
:Hello,
:
:patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
:parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to l
On 31/10/17(Tue) 06:56, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
>
> Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
> line 1843. I assume the ip6_send() is prone to same error.
>
> I'll try to figure ou
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 09:29:10AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 31/10/17(Tue) 06:56, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
> >
> > Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
> >
Hello,
just in case there is yet another brave soul running the diff below:
Hrvoje has managed to trip the ASSERT() in ip_send() function at
line 1843. I assume the ip6_send() is prone to same error.
I'll try to figure out what's going on and send updated diff shortly.
Big thanks to Hrv
Hello,
thank you for looking at my changes. updated patch is below. The list
of changes is as follows:
o SOFTNET_TASKS 1 is defined to 1
o call to task_add():
@@ -1839,5 +1839,5 @@ void
ip_send(struct mbuf *m)
{
mq_enqueue(&ipsend_mq, m);
- task_add(soft
On 30/10/17(Mon) 10:32, Peter Hessler wrote:
> :diff --git a/sys/netinet/ip_input.c b/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> :index 95c9194efcb..33cc3161bcb 100644
> :--- a/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> :+++ b/sys/netinet/ip_input.c
> :@@ -1839,5 +1839,5 @@ void
> : ip_send(struct mbuf *m)
> : {
> : mq_enqueue(&i
On 2017 Oct 30 (Mon) at 08:36:34 +0100 (+0100), Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
:Hello,
:
:patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
:parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to let
:packets received by even NICs (even ifindex) to be processe
On 30/10/17(Mon) 08:36, Alexandr Nedvedicky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
> parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to let
> packets received by even NICs (even ifindex) to be processed by task0, packets
Hello,
patch below adds additional softnet taskq. This will allow certain degree of
parallelism for packet processing in pf_test(). The current plan is to let
packets received by even NICs (even ifindex) to be processed by task0, packets
received by odd NICs (odd ifindex) by task1.
big thanks sho
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:25:59AM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> We're sure the parent is alive when a cloned route is removed from the
> table because removing the parent kill all the children.
>
> Ok?
OK
> Index: net/route.c
>
We're sure the parent is alive when a cloned route is removed from the
table because removing the parent kill all the children.
Ok?
Index: net/route.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v
retrieving revision 1.230
diff -u -p -r1.
Hi. I've ordered two card from ebay and they are working fine on amd64. OK to
commit?
Index: fxp.4
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/fxp.4,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.45 fxp.4
--- fxp.4 15 Jan 2015 20:37:36 -
proper ring size check when runt segment is added
Index: if_vr.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_vr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.115
diff -u -r1.115 if_vr.c
--- if_vr.c 18 Sep 2012 14:49:44 - 1.115
+++ if_vr.c 5 Oc
13 matches
Mail list logo