On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 13:27 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 10:16 +, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 11:16 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 07:35 +, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > > > Hi Martijn,
> > > >
> > > > last November you fi
On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 10:16 +, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 11:16 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 07:35 +, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > > Hi Martijn,
> > >
> > > last November you fixed ber.c so that sequences won't generate
> > > an uninitialized subele
On Tue, 2023-08-22 at 11:16 +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 07:35 +, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> > Hi Martijn,
> >
> > last November you fixed ber.c so that sequences won't generate
> > an uninitialized subelement.
> >
> > This revealed another bug in ober_scanf_elements():
On Mon, 2023-08-21 at 07:35 +, Gerhard Roth wrote:
> Hi Martijn,
>
> last November you fixed ber.c so that sequences won't generate
> an uninitialized subelement.
>
> This revealed another bug in ober_scanf_elements(): it couldn't
> process sequences with an empty list of subelements. The fol
Hi Martijn,
last November you fixed ber.c so that sequences won't generate
an uninitialized subelement.
This revealed another bug in ober_scanf_elements(): it couldn't
process sequences with an empty list of subelements. The following
code failed in ober_scanf_elements():
struct ber_elem
