On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 08:53:04PM +0800, Sean Davies wrote:
> Index: ntpd.conf.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5,v
> retrieving revision 1.46
> diff -u -p -u -r1.46 ntpd.conf.5
> --- ntpd.conf.5
Index: ntpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -p -u -r1.46 ntpd.conf.5
--- ntpd.conf.5 16 May 2020 16:58:12 - 1.46
+++ ntpd.conf.5 6 Jan 2021 12:41:49 -
@@ -119,7
Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> > Nor do you bring up the traffic to the IP addresses offered by
> > pool.ntp.org. That traffic has a pattern easily distinguished as
> > "system startup".
> >
> > What's the difference? There isn't. Yet you brought up only google.
>
> I can understand why someone would
On 2019/12/09 13:16, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> > Nor do you bring up the traffic to the IP addresses offered by
> > pool.ntp.org. That traffic has a pattern easily distinguished as
> > "system startup".
> >
> > What's the difference? There isn't. Yet you brought up only google.
>
> I can understan
> Nor do you bring up the traffic to the IP addresses offered by
> pool.ntp.org. That traffic has a pattern easily distinguished as
> "system startup".
>
> What's the difference? There isn't. Yet you brought up only google.
I can understand why someone would be ok with sending some packets
to
ished as
"system startup".
What's the difference? There isn't. Yet you brought up only google.
If you don't want people to know you are running a ntp server, then
don't run a ntp server.
>As a way of solving that problem one could suggest and point a finger
>e
I meant that as a privacy concern that some users might not be aware of.
As a way of solving that problem one could suggest and point a finger
explicitly on the default ntpd.conf.
Reasons ? A privacy concern that most users won't be aware of.
I might have understood you wrong, otto. P
g www.google.com as a default time constraint by
> > >> > www.openbsd.org.
> > >> > It is claimed that OpenBSD would have sane and secure defaults. While
> > >> > www.google.com might be secure it ain't sane from a privacy concerned
> > >> >
> >> List wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > here a diff replacing www.google.com as a default time constraint by
> >> > www.openbsd.org.
> >> > It is claimed tha
re it ain't sane from a privacy concerned
> perspective. Therefore the diff.
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
>
> Index: etc/ntpd.conf
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/ntpd.conf,v
> retrieving revision 1.16
> d
: etc/ntpd.conf
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/etc/ntpd.conf,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.16 ntpd.conf
--- etc/ntpd.conf 6 Nov 2019 19:04:12 - 1.16
+++ etc/ntpd.conf 5 Dec 2019 21:36:57 -
@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ s
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:59:06PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> Markup a forgotten keyword.
>
> Jan
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
> Index: ntpd.conf.5
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5,v
>
Markup a forgotten keyword.
Jan
Index: ntpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -p -r1.33 ntpd.conf.5
--- ntpd.conf.5 23 Oct 2015 14:52:20 - 1.33
+++ ntpd.conf
On 01/13/2016 06:10 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
$ fgrep constraint /etc/ntpd.conf
constraints from "https://www.google.com";
$
www.google.com and other Google services are not accessible from
countries like China or Vietnam. It's easy enough for people to
change their ntpd.conf i
> $ fgrep constraint /etc/ntpd.conf
> constraints from "https://www.google.com";
> $
>
> www.google.com and other Google services are not accessible from
> countries like China or Vietnam. It's easy enough for people to
> change their ntpd.conf if necessary b
Hello,
$ fgrep constraint /etc/ntpd.conf
constraints from "https://www.google.com";
$
www.google.com and other Google services are not accessible from
countries like China or Vietnam. It's easy enough for people to
change their ntpd.conf if necessary but how about using a defaul
This is similar to what is done for relayd and snmpd, etc.
Index: ntpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p -r1.31 ntpd.conf.5
--- ntpd.conf.5 18 May 2015 11:10:03 -
that
> might be ok as an abbreviation, but at least the example should use
> the full keyword. In the diff below, I used 'constraint from'
> everywhere.
>
fixed, thanks.
jmc
> Index: usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5
> ===
keyword. In the diff below, I used 'constraint from'
everywhere.
Index: usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/ntpd/ntpd.conf.5,v
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -p -r1.27 ntpd.conf.5
--- usr.sbin/ntpd/
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
> 2009/7/22 Ted Unangst :
>> "Open source projects
>>
>> Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
>> pool in their default setup"
> ", but we ask that you get a vendor zone when using the pool as a default"
>
> But Th
2009/7/22 Ted Unangst :
> "Open source projects
>
> Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
> pool in their default setup"
", but we ask that you get a vendor zone when using the pool as a default"
But Theo has spoken.
Best
Martin
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 01:07:42PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jean Rebiffe wrote:
> > To OpenNTPD developers,
> >
> > You use pool.ntp.org in the default configuration of the OpenNTPD
> > daemon since 2004, but that is not compliant with the web page of
> > the po
We don't intend to change anything.
Their decrees are meaningless. They don't provide the ntp traffic,
they only provide DNS records. As written, those rules are designed
to let the people at ntp.org impose a punishing policy against those
they don't like.
Those rules do not improve time distri
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Jean Rebiffe wrote:
> > Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
> > pool in their default setup, but we ask that you get a vendor zone
> > when using the pool as a default configuration.
they obviously don't mean that if it's taken them
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Jean Rebiffe wrote:
> To OpenNTPD developers,
>
> You use pool.ntp.org in the default configuration of the OpenNTPD
> daemon since 2004, but that is not compliant with the web page of
> the pool.ntp.org project designated to software vendors and operating
> system
To OpenNTPD developers,
You use pool.ntp.org in the default configuration of the OpenNTPD
daemon since 2004, but that is not compliant with the web page of
the pool.ntp.org project designated to software vendors and operating
system vendors, http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/vendors.html :
> You must ab
26 matches
Mail list logo
