On Thursday 30 July 2009 05:00:31 Brad wrote:
> The following diff rewrites parts of the code for promiscuous mode
> and multicast handling for the nfe(4) driver. Please test promisc
> mode and multicast mode of operation with any nfe(4) adapters.
>
> Please provide a dmesg.
I'm still looking for
OK, thanks for the explanation.
It wasn't obvious from just reading the diff.
Damien
| On Thursday 30 July 2009 05:12:50 damien.bergam...@free.fr wrote:
| > Except "rewriting parts of the code", what does this diff do?
| > Does it fix an existing bug?
| > Or is it just rewriting for the sake of
On Thursday 30 July 2009 05:12:50 damien.bergam...@free.fr wrote:
> Except "rewriting parts of the code", what does this diff do?
> Does it fix an existing bug?
> Or is it just rewriting for the sake of rewriting?
The current ALLMULTI flag handling is a bug.
Drivers should now be checking ac->ac_
Except "rewriting parts of the code", what does this diff do?
Does it fix an existing bug?
Or is it just rewriting for the sake of rewriting?
Damien
| The following diff rewrites parts of the code for promiscuous mode
| and multicast handling for the nfe(4) driver. Please test promisc
| mode and
The following diff rewrites parts of the code for promiscuous mode
and multicast handling for the nfe(4) driver. Please test promisc
mode and multicast mode of operation with any nfe(4) adapters.
Please provide a dmesg.
Index: if_nfe.c
