Re: netinet DPRINTF

2017-11-06 Thread Paul Irofti
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 02:06:58PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I'm auditing code related to pr_input() to take them outside of the > KERNEL_LOCK(). It's hard because many DPRINTF() statements include > the name of the function they are in. Diff below convert most of > them to "%s" + __func__.

Re: netinet DPRINTF

2017-11-06 Thread Sebastian Benoit
ok! Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2017.11.06 14:06:58 +0100: > I'm auditing code related to pr_input() to take them outside of the > KERNEL_LOCK(). It's hard because many DPRINTF() statements include > the name of the function they are in. Diff below convert most of > them to "%s" + __fun

Re: netinet DPRINTF

2017-11-06 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
On Mon, Nov 06 2017, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > I'm auditing code related to pr_input() to take them outside of the > KERNEL_LOCK(). It's hard because many DPRINTF() statements include > the name of the function they are in. Diff below convert most of > them to "%s" + __func__. > > ok? yep -- j

Re: netinet DPRINTF

2017-11-06 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:06:58 +0100 > From: Martin Pieuchot > > I'm auditing code related to pr_input() to take them outside of the > KERNEL_LOCK(). It's hard because many DPRINTF() statements include > the name of the function they are in. Diff below convert most of > them to "%s" + __func_

netinet DPRINTF

2017-11-06 Thread Martin Pieuchot
I'm auditing code related to pr_input() to take them outside of the KERNEL_LOCK(). It's hard because many DPRINTF() statements include the name of the function they are in. Diff below convert most of them to "%s" + __func__. ok? Index: netinet/ip_ah.c ===