On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:43:42AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:18:12AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Access rt_llinfo either with nd6 mutex or exclusive netlock.
>
> Can you leave a comment at the read-only ioctl wrt. exclusive net lock?
Even better. nd6_lookup()
> On 12 May 2023, at 15:07, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:43:42AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
>>> Access rt_llinfo and check for NULL without checking RTF_LLINFO
>>> flag before. They are changed togehter with the arp or nd6 mutex.
>>
>> It is the same change, but I'd co
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:43:42AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Access rt_llinfo and check for NULL without checking RTF_LLINFO
> > flag before. They are changed togehter with the arp or nd6 mutex.
>
> It is the same change, but I'd commit ARP separately (you don't change
> any locking semanti
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:18:12AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to remove the kernel lock from nd6 resolve and use nd6
> mutex instead.
>
> Access rt_llinfo and check for NULL without checking RTF_LLINFO
> flag before. They are changed togehter with the arp or nd6 mutex.
Hi,
I would like to remove the kernel lock from nd6 resolve and use nd6
mutex instead.
Access rt_llinfo and check for NULL without checking RTF_LLINFO
flag before. They are changed togehter with the arp or nd6 mutex.
Access rt_llinfo either with nd6 mutex or exclusive netlock.
Remove some need