On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 06:33:29PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> So my "unlocking the reaper" diff that was committed the other day
> breaks the MP architectures that don't have an "mpsafe" pmap yet (see
> my commit message). Is seems hppa's pmap is actually safe enough, but
> alpha, m88k, mips64
On 19/07/15(Sun) 18:33, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> So my "unlocking the reaper" diff that was committed the other day
> breaks the MP architectures that don't have an "mpsafe" pmap yet (see
> my commit message). Is seems hppa's pmap is actually safe enough, but
> alpha, m88k, mips64 and powerpc aren't
Mark Kettenis schreef op 2015-07-19 18:33:
So my "unlocking the reaper" diff that was committed the other day
breaks the MP architectures that don't have an "mpsafe" pmap yet (see
my commit message). Is seems hppa's pmap is actually safe enough, but
alpha, m88k, mips64 and powerpc aren't. The d
So my "unlocking the reaper" diff that was committed the other day
breaks the MP architectures that don't have an "mpsafe" pmap yet (see
my commit message). Is seems hppa's pmap is actually safe enough, but
alpha, m88k, mips64 and powerpc aren't. The diff below fixes alpha
and powerpc with a big
