Re: more ipsec mbuf pointer

2021-10-24 Thread Vitaliy Makkoveev
> On 24 Oct 2021, at 19:00, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 02:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: >> There are more m_pullup()s in IPsec input. Pass down the pointer >> to the mbuf. At the end it will reach ip_deliver() which expects >> a pointer to an mbuf anyway. > > Me

Re: [External] : Re: more ipsec mbuf pointer

2021-10-24 Thread Alexandr Nedvedicky
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 06:00:59PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 02:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > There are more m_pullup()s in IPsec input. Pass down the pointer > > to the mbuf. At the end it will reach ip_deliver() which expects > > a pointer to an mbuf an

Re: more ipsec mbuf pointer

2021-10-24 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 02:52:45AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > There are more m_pullup()s in IPsec input. Pass down the pointer > to the mbuf. At the end it will reach ip_deliver() which expects > a pointer to an mbuf anyway. Merged to -current. ok? bluhm Index: netinet/ip_ah.c ==

more ipsec mbuf pointer

2021-10-23 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, There are more m_pullup()s in IPsec input. Pass down the pointer to the mbuf. At the end it will reach ip_deliver() which expects a pointer to an mbuf anyway. ok? bluhm Index: netinet/ip_ah.c === RCS file: /data/mirror/openbs