On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:49:42PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 06:34:17PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> >> I took another look at the way junk works in malloc, and there's a few
> >> improvements I'd like to make.
>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:12, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 06:34:17PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
>> I took another look at the way junk works in malloc, and there's a few
>> improvements I'd like to make.
>> I have't been able to build perl reliably with this diff, but haven't
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 06:34:17PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> I took another look at the way junk works in malloc, and there's a few
> improvements I'd like to make.
>
> 1. Remove the Z option. In general, I think malloc options should make
> programs crash more, not less. This option is a banda
I took another look at the way junk works in malloc, and there's a few
improvements I'd like to make.
1. Remove the Z option. In general, I think malloc options should make
programs crash more, not less. This option is a bandaid, but looks
like something that makes things better. (Anecdotally, I'v
