On 2022/10/13 13:35:18 +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> On 2022-10-13 12:16 +02, Omar Polo wrote:
> > small quality-of-life addition. GNU Emacs has zap-to-char bound by to
> > M-z and zap-up-to-char unbound; i'm unsure how closely we want to
> > follow emacs here, IMHO zap-up-to-char is way more us
On 2022-10-13 12:16 +02, Omar Polo wrote:
> small quality-of-life addition. GNU Emacs has zap-to-char bound by to
> M-z and zap-up-to-char unbound; i'm unsure how closely we want to
> follow emacs here, IMHO zap-up-to-char is way more useful than
> zap-to-char and so i opted to bound M-z to zap-u
small quality-of-life addition. GNU Emacs has zap-to-char bound by to
M-z and zap-up-to-char unbound; i'm unsure how closely we want to
follow emacs here, IMHO zap-up-to-char is way more useful than
zap-to-char and so i opted to bound M-z to zap-up-to-char by default.
ok?
diff 40c942665e2a6e7365
