On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 13:38 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> So the reason mikeb@'s mbuf changes caused issues is that the way we
> define struct mbuf is inherently fragile because it doesn't take
> structure padding into account. Adding an int64_t member to struct
> pkthdr changed the alignment fr
So the reason mikeb@'s mbuf changes caused issues is that the way we
define struct mbuf is inherently fragile because it doesn't take
structure padding into account. Adding an int64_t member to struct
pkthdr changed the alignment from 4 bytes to 8 bytes on most 32-bit
architectures (but not i386).
