On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 16:51, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> I think mandoc should adjust its default output width based on the
>> terminal size. At least in the case where the terminal is narrow. This
>> diff doesn't change anything if you have wider than 80 column terminals.
>
> I agree with your idea
Hi Ted,
Ted Unangst wrote on Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:32:42AM -0400:
> One machine I use has terminals that happen to be very nicely sized at
> 75 columns wide. Day to day, this is almost perfect, except when trying
> to view a man page, because just a little too much text goes on each
> line.
>
On 21/07/13(Sun) 10:32, Ted Unangst wrote:
> One machine I use has terminals that happen to be very nicely sized at
> 75 columns wide. Day to day, this is almost perfect, except when trying
> to view a man page, because just a little too much text goes on each
> line.
>
> I think mandoc should adj
One machine I use has terminals that happen to be very nicely sized at
75 columns wide. Day to day, this is almost perfect, except when trying
to view a man page, because just a little too much text goes on each
line.
I think mandoc should adjust its default output width based on the
terminal size
