On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:05 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
> Silly even though, the description of lsearch says it will modify
> ("it shall be added at the end of") the table, for which "base
> argument points to the first element"?
Ah, I didn't pay close attention to the definition and assumed i
;>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 5:38 PM, enh wrote:
>>> > POSIX says lsearch's 'base' is void*, not const void*.
>>> >
>>> > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/lsearch.html
>>> >
>>> > openbsd gets this wrong in search.h and lsearch.c. (but lfind is
>>> > correct --- that should be const void*.)
>>> >
>>> > -e
>>> >
>
>
h's 'base' is void*, not const void*.
>> >
>> > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/lsearch.html
>> >
>> > openbsd gets this wrong in search.h and lsearch.c. (but lfind is
>> > correct --- that should be const void*.)
>> >
>> > -e
>> >
at 5:38 PM, enh wrote:
> POSIX says lsearch's 'base' is void*, not const void*.
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/lsearch.html
>
> openbsd gets this wrong in search.h and lsearch.c. (but lfind is
> correct --- that should be const void*.)
>
> -e
>
