Re: link-local address issues

2014-05-20 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: | On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: | > As can be seen, the host part of the link-local address doesn't | > resemble the lladdr at all. This isn't a problem for outgoing | > connections, but when using SL

Re: link-local address issues

2014-05-20 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 11:33:48AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > As can be seen, the host part of the link-local address doesn't > resemble the lladdr at all. This isn't a problem for outgoing > connections, but when using SLAAC the global unicast address that is > assigned is now suddenly differe

Re: link-local address issues

2014-05-20 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Hey Paul, On 20/05/14(Tue) 11:33, Paul de Weerd wrote: > Hi all, Martin, > > There seems to be an issue with generating eui64 addresses. Indeed, thanks for reporting the problem. > [weerd@pom] $ ifconfig em0 > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > lladdr b8:ca:3a:93:03:e8 > inet6 fe80::3c1

link-local address issues

2014-05-20 Thread Paul de Weerd
Hi all, Martin, There seems to be an issue with generating eui64 addresses. [weerd@pom] $ ifconfig em0 em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 lladdr b8:ca:3a:93:03:e8 inet6 fe80::3c16:979e:9360:ec89%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 [weerd@pom] $ sysctl kern.version kern.version=OpenBSD 5.5-current