On 29/10/17(Sun) 12:05, Helg Bredow wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > + } else if (strchr(o->templ, '%') == NULL) {
> > > + *((int *)(data + o->off)) = o->val;
> >
> > Are you sure you can simply deference "data + o->off" w/o sanity check?
>
> I don't know what sani
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 10:07:39 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 17/10/17(Tue) 14:26, Helg Bredow wrote:
> > [...]
> > I've split the patch. This one improves argument and option parsing so that
> > almost all sshfs arguments and options will now parse. It won't recognise
> > -ocache=no since fu
On 17/10/17(Tue) 14:26, Helg Bredow wrote:
> [...]
> I've split the patch. This one improves argument and option parsing so that
> almost all sshfs arguments and options will now parse. It won't recognise
> -ocache=no since fuse_opt_match() is incorrect (fuse will treat it the same
> as -ocache
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:33:45 +0200
Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 14/10/17(Sat) 01:23, Helg Bredow wrote:
> > The attached patch vastly improves fuse argument and option parsing. For
> > example, all sshfs options will now be parsed successfully. It's a
> > substantial patch and can't be easily br
On 14/10/17(Sat) 01:23, Helg Bredow wrote:
> The attached patch vastly improves fuse argument and option parsing. For
> example, all sshfs options will now be parsed successfully. It's a
> substantial patch and can't be easily broken down further.
>
> In addition, this also adds support for the
The attached patch vastly improves fuse argument and option parsing. For
example, all sshfs options will now be parsed successfully. It's a substantial
patch and can't be easily broken down further.
In addition, this also adds support for the -d and -odebug options.
I've also included a regress
