ok beck@, with an appropriate commit message
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 06:59:28PM -0500, Brent Cook wrote:
> I copied some of the commit text here from BoringSSL, but it's wrong for
> LibreSSL it seems.
>
> BN_ULLONG is not defined on all 64-bit systems as far as I can tell. So, this
> fix is mo
I copied some of the commit text here from BoringSSL, but it's wrong for
LibreSSL it seems.
BN_ULLONG is not defined on all 64-bit systems as far as I can tell. So, this
fix is more widely applicable than Win64 for LibreSSL.
Any comments?
- Brent
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 8:40 AM, Brent Cook wr
On systems where we do not have BN_ULLONG (notably Win64), BN_mod_word()
can return incorrect results if the supplied modulus is too big.
Note now that BN_mod_word may fail, like BN_div_word. Handle this
properly and document in the man page.
Thanks to Brian Smith for pointing out these fixes fro
