On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:41 AM, Miod Vallat wrote:
> >> Noted by VS2013, const values should be initialized (though I think
> >> the 'static' should also implicitly zero).
> >
> > this sounds like the compiler doesn't know C?
>
> He is talking about Visual Studio. The C part of that piece of shi
>> Noted by VS2013, const values should be initialized (though I think
>> the 'static' should also implicitly zero).
>
> this sounds like the compiler doesn't know C?
He is talking about Visual Studio. The C part of that piece of shit
pretending to be a compiler only supports a subset of C89.
Brent Cook wrote:
> Noted by VS2013, const values should be initialized (though I think
> the 'static' should also implicitly zero).
this sounds like the compiler doesn't know C?
> This also removes some unused code that also contained uninitialized
> static consts.
that part looks fine.
Noted by VS2013, const values should be initialized (though I think
the 'static' should also implicitly zero).
This also removes some unused code that also contained uninitialized
static consts.
ok?
Index: evp/e_chacha20poly1305.c
=
