On 2020-05-08, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> Out of curiosity, do you run (o)ksh on machines where this matters?
Yes, my C compiler (https://sr.ht/~mcf/cproc/) follows the standard
fairly strictly.
> Aside from the increased portability, the code doesn't look worse, and
> fewer uses of void
On Thu, May 07 2020, Michael Forney wrote:
> I originally submitted this patch as a portability fix to Brian
> Callahan's oksh, but he suggested I submit it here instead.
Out of curiosity, do you run (o)ksh on machines where this matters?
> Conversion of function pointer to void pointer is not a
I originally submitted this patch as a portability fix to Brian
Callahan's oksh, but he suggested I submit it here instead.
Conversion of function pointer to void pointer is not allowed in
ISO C, though POSIX requires it for dlsym(). However, here we are
also comparing function pointer to void poi
