On a new amd64 install w/ install73.img there was a shutdown message
about kernel relinking failing.
A manual sha256 -h /var/db/KERNEL.SHA256 /bsd also failed - no such
file.
My /var/db had kernel.SHA256 but no KERNEL.SHA256.
I'm not the only one:
https://daemonforums.org/showthread.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:21:46PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> (the extra register used by PIE > hurts i386 mode a lot more than amd64
> mode with its extra registers),
Just for the sake of correctness: it hurts much less on x86_64, because
there is IP-relative addressing for code *and* data.
You've made a pretty big assumption there.
When we see something we don't think is important, we delete the
email and carry on with more important things.
You think hand-tuning this one paragraph is going to reduce the amount
of mail we delete because it doesn't matter? It won't.
A large numbe
Because you might not wish to deal with people like me posting dmesg's
of absurdly deficient hardware on the lists. Putting minimum values up
means you can cast off everything you don't want to bother trying to
support as 'not worth your time', without anyone else having to
discover that it was
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Nobody should really by using i386 for new systems. The advantages
> of running amd64-compatible hardware are too big to ignore. Lower power
> consumption, much faster in most cases (the extra register used by PIE
> hurts i386 mode a lot more than amd64 mode with its ext
Nobody should really by using i386 for new systems. The advantages
of running amd64-compatible hardware are too big to ignore. Lower power
consumption, much faster in most cases (the extra register used by PIE
hurts i386 mode a lot more than amd64 mode with its extra registers),
more address space
Le Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:37:12 +0200,
Janne Johansson a écrit :
> Den tors 23 sep. 2021 kl 14:27 skrev Patrick Harper :
> >
> > If there will continue to be a minimum disk value then 600MB wouldn't
> > be nearly enough for swap, maybe 2GB for a whole disk?
>
> Could this handwaving please stop?
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:37 AM Janne Johansson wrote:
> Could this handwaving please stop? If anyone wants, make a i386 VM and
> do a binary search and record the minimums.
>
I have done this exercise, but not for kernel relinking -- it was for doing
full system rebuilds.
Starting
Den tors 23 sep. 2021 kl 14:27 skrev Patrick Harper :
>
> If there will continue to be a minimum disk value then 600MB wouldn't
> be nearly enough for swap, maybe 2GB for a whole disk?
Could this handwaving please stop? If anyone wants, make a i386 VM and
do a binary search and record the minimums
If there will continue to be a minimum disk value then 600MB wouldn't
be nearly enough for swap, maybe 2GB for a whole disk?
--
Patrick Harper
paia...@fastmail.com
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, at 11:29, Zé Loff wrote:
> IMHO, stating minimum disk space requirements might be useful for
> determining
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:29:53AM +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Patrick Harper wrote:
> > If the situation isn't going to change anytime soon then I have some
> > diffs for INSTALL.i386 and INSTALL.amd64. The latter has not specified
> > disk requirements, I g
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 05:27:30PM +0100, Patrick Harper wrote:
> If the situation isn't going to change anytime soon then I have some
> diffs for INSTALL.i386 and INSTALL.amd64. The latter has not specified
> disk requirements, I guess since anyone who owns an amd64 system will
> very likely be
If the situation isn't going to change anytime soon then I have some
diffs for INSTALL.i386 and INSTALL.amd64. The latter has not specified
disk requirements, I guess since anyone who owns an amd64 system will
very likely be using a disk big enough for X, so I figured that the
same would apply
> Does it make sense to move ctfstrip and ctfconv to base?
Yes, they should be in base.
On Sun 20/08/2017 14:20, Björn Ketelaars wrote:
> I just upgraded my machine to a newer snapshot. Unfortunately the kernel
> relinking bit failed. Root cause is that strip has been replaced by ctfstrip,
> which is part of the comp set, which I have not installed.
>
> The exact same
I just upgraded my machine to a newer snapshot. Unfortunately the kernel
relinking bit failed. Root cause is that strip has been replaced by ctfstrip,
which is part of the comp set, which I have not installed.
The exact same thing happened when strip was part of the comp set. Solution
then was
eeing this log.
> >>
> >> Jul 18 22:47:36 x3550m4 /etc/rc: kernel relinking failed; see
> >> /usr/share/compile/GENERIC.MP/relink.log
> > Sorry, this is my mistake. I completely forgot to make a current.html
> > entry.
> >
> > You need to build and
On 18.7.2017. 22:59, Theo Buehler wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55:59PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> i have checkout cvs tree few minutes ago and i'm seeing this log.
>>
>> Jul 18 22:47:36 x3550m4 /etc/rc: kernel relinking failed
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55:59PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i have checkout cvs tree few minutes ago and i'm seeing this log.
>
> Jul 18 22:47:36 x3550m4 /etc/rc: kernel relinking failed; see
> /usr/share/compile/GENERIC.MP/relink.log
Sorry, this is m
Hi all,
i have checkout cvs tree few minutes ago and i'm seeing this log.
Jul 18 22:47:36 x3550m4 /etc/rc: kernel relinking failed; see
/usr/share/compile/GENERIC.MP/relink.log
here it is:
http://kosjenka.srce.hr/~hrvoje/zaprocvat/relink.log
OpenBSD 6.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #8: Tue J
I haven't been paying attention to mail on these LDOMs. Thanks for the
heads up. Output looks good.
>From r...@puffyfive.ldom.openbsd.local Sat Jul 1 14:07:05 2017
Delivered-To: r...@puffyfive.ldom.openbsd.local
From: Charlie Root
To: r...@puffyfive.ldom.openbsd.local
Subject: puffyfive.ldom.ope
> I've put the snapshot LDOM through some paces with each snapshot: high CPU
> load, networking, and heavy filesystem utilization. It's every bit as solid
> as the other LDOMs. I have only seen the "relinking" message at the end of
> snapshot upgrades, but due to /bsd changing upon each reboot, I b
sparc64 snapshots, run inside an LDOM. Primary domain and the other 6 LDOMs
are 6.1-STABLE.
I've put the snapshot LDOM through some paces with each snapshot: high CPU
load, networking, and heavy filesystem utilization. It's every bit as solid
as the other LDOMs. I have only seen the "relinking" me
5 weeks ago at d2k17 I started work on randomized kernels. I've been
having conversations with other developers for nearly 5 years on the
topic... but never got off to a good start, probably because I was
trying to pawn the work off on others.
Having done this, I really had no idea we'd end up wh
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:35:55PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> There is a diff in snapshots which does kernel relinking during
> install or upgrade.
>
> Really amazing...
This is now committed to the tree.
--
-=[rpe]=-
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 08:58:13AM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
>
> - should /$MODE.site to ran after "generating sha256 from /bsd" and
> before "relinking to create an unique kernel" ? it should let "make
> newbsd" detect /bsd modification, and not relinking the kernel.
small correcti
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:35:55PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> There is a diff in snapshots which does kernel relinking during
> install or upgrade.
>
> Really amazing...
>
I have an issue regarding kernel relinking during upgrade.
Not a big chunk, but I prefer to report it to
> On Mon 26/06/2017 14:35, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > There is a diff in snapshots which does kernel relinking during
> > install or upgrade.
> >
> > Really amazing...
>
> Works as advertised, assuming that compXX is installed. The relinking bit uses
>
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:35:55PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> There is a diff in snapshots which does kernel relinking during
> install or upgrade.
>
> Really amazing...
>
This does sound amazing! Upgrade time
On Mon 26/06/2017 14:35, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> There is a diff in snapshots which does kernel relinking during
> install or upgrade.
>
> Really amazing...
Works as advertised, assuming that compXX is installed. The relinking bit uses
strip, which is part of the compiler collecti
There is a diff in snapshots which does kernel relinking during
install or upgrade.
Really amazing...
31 matches
Mail list logo
