> Not sure the BEGIN/END mwm/led.c comments make any sense. But
> otherwise this looks fine to me.
They used to help. I agree, not anymore.
> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 21:07:49 +0200
> From: Stefan Sperling
>
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 07:28:44PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Not sure the BEGIN/END mwm/led.c comments make any sense.
>
> Would you agree with removing all these kinds of comments?
> If so, I'll do that in a separate comm
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 07:28:44PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Not sure the BEGIN/END mwm/led.c comments make any sense.
Would you agree with removing all these kinds of comments?
If so, I'll do that in a separate commit.
They bother me as well because things change and move around a lot in Lin
> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 12:56:19 +0200
> From: Stefan Sperling
>
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > This diff enables the wifi LED with iwm(4) devices.
> >
> > Tested using a non-thinkpad netbook with wifi LED. I'm not sure
> > if any modern thinkpads even ha
On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 02:23:44PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> This diff enables the wifi LED with iwm(4) devices.
>
> Tested using a non-thinkpad netbook with wifi LED. I'm not sure
> if any modern thinkpads even have wifi LEDs these days :-/
>
> Unfortunately, there seems to be know way of
This diff enables the wifi LED with iwm(4) devices.
Tested using a non-thinkpad netbook with wifi LED. I'm not sure
if any modern thinkpads even have wifi LEDs these days :-/
Unfortunately, there seems to be know way of controlling blinking
in hardware so use a timeout instead.
OK?
Index: if_iw
