> On 26 Feb 2021, at 14:08, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I always bothered me that ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() behave
> sligtly differently. Unify them and use an mlist to simplify the
> fragment list.
>
> - The functions ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() always consume the mbuf.
I like it. I would like it more if you named the mbuf list variable "fml".
ok by me.
> On 26 Feb 2021, at 9:08 pm, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I always bothered me that ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() behave
> sligtly differently. Unify them and use an mlist to simplify the
> fragment
Hi,
I always bothered me that ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() behave
sligtly differently. Unify them and use an mlist to simplify the
fragment list.
- The functions ip_fragment() and ip6_fragment() always consume the mbuf.
- They free the mbuf and mbuf list in case of an error.
- They care abou
