On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 10:31:38AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 02:10:22AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > It does not have the prettiest signature, but nicely folds identical
> > copies into MI softraid.c, which then allows us to
> > - avoid further diverging MD code
> > -
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 02:10:22AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> It does not have the prettiest signature, but nicely folds identical
> copies into MI softraid.c, which then allows us to
> - avoid further diverging MD code
> - implement the keydisk fix on tech@ once instead of thrice
> - reuse sr_o
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 02:10:22AM +, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> It does not have the prettiest signature, but nicely folds identical
> copies into MI softraid.c, which then allows us to
> - avoid further diverging MD code
> - implement the keydisk fix on tech@ once instead of thrice
> - reuse sr_o
It does not have the prettiest signature, but nicely folds identical
copies into MI softraid.c, which then allows us to
- avoid further diverging MD code
- implement the keydisk fix on tech@ once instead of thrice
- reuse sr_open_chunk() in an upcoming diff to make -p softraid aware
The last point
