Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Dynamic installboot would be nice but I don't have strong opinoins about
> it, so best drop the diff and retain the chance to repair your system.
These are the static binaries:
./libexec/ld.so/ldconfig
obvious why
./sbin/dhcpleased
./sbin/iked
./sbin/isakmpd
./sb
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 12:16:56PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This binary being static has nothing to do with "installer testing".
> You've got that completely wrong. It has nothing to do with reacharounds
> either, since instbin takes care of all that.
Thanks.
>
> It has to do with people w
This binary being static has nothing to do with "installer testing".
You've got that completely wrong. It has nothing to do with reacharounds
either, since instbin takes care of all that.
It has to do with people who may want to use it when their systems are
broken in some way, to repair their sy
Spotted through failed attempts to test libutil/opendev(3) changes
with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Regular installboot(8) has been linking statically since import in
2013, which probably stems from when early reach arounds of the
installer to the installation's installboot binary.
These days all architectu
