Hello,
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 09:40:00PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Regress tested with witness, rebased to current, anyone?
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > pf_socket_lookup() calls in_pcbhashlookup() in the PCB layer. So
> > to run pf
Regress tested with witness, rebased to current, anyone?
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pf_socket_lookup() calls in_pcbhashlookup() in the PCB layer. So
> to run pf in parallel we must make parts of the stack MP safe.
> Protect the list and hashes in t
Hi,
pf_socket_lookup() calls in_pcbhashlookup() in the PCB layer. So
to run pf in parallel we must make parts of the stack MP safe.
Protect the list and hashes in the PCB tables with a mutex.
Note that the protocol notify functions may call pf via tcp_output().
As the pf lock is a sleeping rw_lo
