"Todd C. Miller" writes:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:23:33 -0600, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
>
>> We could get rid of struct sockinet entirely but I wasn't sure
> it > was worth it.
>
> Here's a diff that replaces sockunion with the more common
> sockaddr_union.
ok jca@
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5
On Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:23:33 -0600, "Todd C. Miller" wrote:
> We could get rid of struct sockinet entirely but I wasn't sure
it > was worth it.
Here's a diff that replaces sockunion with the more common
sockaddr_union.
- todd
Index: usr.bin/ftp/ftp.c
===
This adds struct sockaddr to sockunion so we can just use &foo.su_sa
instead of (struct sockaddr *)&foo. No functional difference but
it lets the compiler warn when appropriate. The diff also sync the
types in struct sockinet to match the first three fields of struct
sockaddr_in.
We could get ri
