committed. thanks Rob
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:30:17PM -0400, Rob Pierce wrote:
> There is only one result mentioned: ready-to-install binary packages.
>
> Rob
>
> Index: faq15.html
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs
There is only one result mentioned: ready-to-install binary packages.
Rob
Index: faq15.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq15.html,v
retrieving revision 1.141
diff -u -p -r1.141 faq15.html
--- faq15.html 1 Sep 2016 12:05:14 -
d may not refer
back to faq4.html when they later run into partition size issues after
following the untar guidance in faq15.
A link to #AddThoughts in this section of faq15.html might be appropriate.
> 2016-07-19 3:29 GMT+02:00 Josh Grosse :
> > I had a conversation with a new OpenBS
uilding.
>
> This proposed recommendation adds two sentences which may clarify,
> following immediately after the untar example.
>
> Index: faq15.html
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq15.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.138
&g
s who selected automatic disk allocation that
the default partition size may be inadequate for all but minor ports building.
This proposed recommendation adds two sentences which may clarify,
following immediately after the untar example.
Index: faq15
recipient
-Bryce
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bryce Chidester
Date: Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:20 AM
Subject: faq15.html
To: w...@openbsd.org
Section 15.3.1 mentions the components of a port, including
> A distfile, containing distribution file checksums and size
Seeing as that file is named &q
