Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-08 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Max Fillinger writes: > On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 01:40:00PM +1000, Steven McDonald wrote: >> +sudo(8) has been removed from the base OS. >> +The old binaries and manual pages should be removed: >> + >> + rm -f /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/sudoedit /usr/sbin/visudo >> + rm -f /usr/share/man/m

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-08 Thread Max Fillinger
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 01:40:00PM +1000, Steven McDonald wrote: > +sudo(8) has been removed from the base OS. > +The old binaries and manual pages should be removed: > + > + rm -f /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/sudoedit /usr/sbin/visudo > + rm -f /usr/share/man/man8/sudo.8 /usr/share/man/man8/

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-07 Thread sven falempin
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 05:52:54PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > >Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine > many > > > >use sudo > > > > > > Sorry, we are making room in the tree so that lynx can come back. >

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-06 Thread Theo de Raadt
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 05:52:54PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > >Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine many > > >use sudo > > > > Sorry, we are making room in the tree so that lynx can come back. > > An actual serious answer would make sense at this point, you k

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-06 Thread Marc Espie
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 05:52:54PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine many > >use sudo > > Sorry, we are making room in the tree so that lynx can come back. An actual serious answer would make sense at this point, you know...

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
>Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine many >use sudo Sorry, we are making room in the tree so that lynx can come back.

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-04 Thread Devin Ceartas
On 4 Jul 2015, at 11:16, Todd C. Miller wrote: On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:36:58 +0530, Hrishikesh Muruk wrote: Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine many use sudo The version of sudo in base was 5 years old and not really maintainable. Theo has been uncomfortable

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-04 Thread Todd C. Miller
On Sat, 04 Jul 2015 15:36:58 +0530, Hrishikesh Muruk wrote: > Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine many > use sudo The version of sudo in base was 5 years old and not really maintainable. Theo has been uncomfortable with the amount of code in sudo that runs as root

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-04 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 03:36:58PM +0530, Hrishikesh Muruk wrote: > Why is sudo being removed from base? Because millert@ and deraadt@ decided to do so. You can read some explanations in this thread: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=143465998814989&w=2 and tedu@'s blog post http://www.tedunan

Re: faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-04 Thread Hrishikesh Muruk
Why is sudo being removed from base? It is pretty useful. I imagine many use sudo Thanks Hrishi On Saturday 4 July 2015, Steven McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a patch for current.html telling users how to handle the sudo > removal from base. > > Index: faq/current.html > =

faq/current.html: Mention sudo removal

2015-07-03 Thread Steven McDonald
Hi, Here's a patch for current.html telling users how to handle the sudo removal from base. Index: faq/current.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/current.html,v retrieving revision 1.614 diff -u -p -r1.614 current.html --- faq/current.h