On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Bob Beck wrote:
>> I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
>> quotes, but it might be a "bit" long. Bob might even remember why I
>> say that.
>
> I remember. Your response was priceless
share!
>>>
>
> It
> I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
> quotes, but it might be a "bit" long. Bob might even remember why I
> say that.
I remember. Your response was priceless
>>>
>>> share!
>>
It wasn't the response itself that was funny. it was the respo
On 11/05/10 19:43, Eichert, Diana wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:34 PM, patrick keshishian < pkesh...@gmail.com >
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Marco S Hyman wrote:
I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
quotes, but it might be a "bit" lo
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:34 PM, patrick keshishian < pkesh...@gmail.com >
wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Marco S Hyman wrote:
>>> I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
>>> quotes, but it might be a "bit" long. Bob might even remember why I
>>> say that.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Marco S Hyman wrote:
>> I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
>> quotes, but it might be a "bit" long. Bob might even remember why I
>> say that.
>
> I remember. Your response was priceless
share!
> I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
> quotes, but it might be a "bit" long. Bob might even remember why I
> say that.
I remember. Your response was priceless
/\/\arc
I've always thought Bob's comment from 2/11/2005, was worth adding to
quotes, but it might be a "bit" long. Bob might even remember why I
say that.
diana
Bob Beck said on Feb 11, 2005 in a comment Re: Star & OpenBSD .
OpenBSD wants even the worst nastiest
anal-carotid-constriction-software-pat
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> I like that, and probably worth a fortune cookie, starting with a dedicated
> cookie file just for theo!
> OK? ;)
Here's to you ;)
ciao,
david
Write more code.
%
Make more commits.
%
That's because you have been slacking.
%
slacker!
%
That's
2010 07:23:58 -
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+note to axe murderers: ietf and other such organizations are purposely
+weak at checking badges at their events, because who would want to go
+to them? use this to your advangage. the people attending these
+meetings are generally pretty unfit and move slowly, so you don't need
+a large, long handled axe -- something small will do.
+
+Theo de Raadt on tech@ answering the thread: document ldapd schema files
+
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:32:45PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On second thought, I should answer with a little less snark, though I
> > think this one attribute sums it up pretty well.
> >
> > First, some committee sat around and tried to come up with all the
> > things needed to describe a p
> On second thought, I should answer with a little less snark, though I
> think this one attribute sums it up pretty well.
>
>
I enjoyed the first response but thanks for the follow-up.
> First, some committee sat around and tried to come up with all the
> things needed to describe a person, like
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 02:32:45PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > On second thought, I should answer with a little less snark, though I
> > think this one attribute sums it up pretty well.
> >
> > First, some committee sat around and tried to come up with all the
> > things needed to describe a p
4 nov 2010 kl. 21.22 skrev Ted Unangst:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Adam M. Dutko
wrote:
I can't really comment on the accuracy because I'm trying to avoid
learning about LDAP at all cost, but this gives me enough info to
st
> On second thought, I should answer with a little less snark, though I
> think this one attribute sums it up pretty well.
>
> First, some committee sat around and tried to come up with all the
> things needed to describe a person, like license plates and pager
> numbers and who your secretary is.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Adam M. Dutko wrote:
>>> I can't really comment on the accuracy because I'm trying to avoid
>>> learning about LDAP at all cost, but this gives me enough info to
>>> start searching with, so I think it's a great
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Adam M. Dutko wrote:
>> I can't really comment on the accuracy because I'm trying to avoid
>> learning about LDAP at all cost, but this gives me enough info to
>> start searching with, so I think it's a great addition.
>>
>
> What is the technical reason behind not
4 nov 2010 kl. 20.10 skrev Adam M. Dutko:
>> I can't really comment on the accuracy because I'm trying to avoid
>> learning about LDAP at all cost, but this gives me enough info to
>> start searching with, so I think it's a great addition.
>>
>
> What is the technical reason behind not wanting to
> I can't really comment on the accuracy because I'm trying to avoid
> learning about LDAP at all cost, but this gives me enough info to
> start searching with, so I think it's a great addition.
>
What is the technical reason behind not wanting to learn about LDAP? I'd be
interested to hear feedb
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Martin Hedenfalk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> Am I missing something, or is there no documentation for the schema
>> files? man ldapd.conf tells me I can include additional schema files
>> via the schema keyword, but noth
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 01:19:26PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Am I missing something, or is there no documentation for the schema
> files? man ldapd.conf tells me I can include additional schema files
> via the schema keyword, but nothing tells me what to put in those
> files.
Following diff att
20 matches
Mail list logo
