On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 04:29:59PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15 2018, "Michael W. Bombardieri" wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 05:47:43PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jan 14 2018, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:25:15PM
On Mon, Jan 15 2018, "Michael W. Bombardieri" wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 05:47:43PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 14 2018, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:25:15PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Revision 1.9 of tr
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 05:47:43PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14 2018, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:25:15PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Revision 1.9 of tree.c (from 1999) added the disabled code and it
> >> is still
On Sun, Jan 14 2018, Anton Lindqvist wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:25:15PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Revision 1.9 of tree.c (from 1999) added the disabled code and it
>> is still disabled. Would it be better to remove it?
>
> Fine with me. Anyone else willing OK?
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:25:15PM +0800, Michael W. Bombardieri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Revision 1.9 of tree.c (from 1999) added the disabled code and it
> is still disabled. Would it be better to remove it?
Fine with me. Anyone else willing OK?
> - Michael
>
>
> Index: tree.c
> =
Hello,
Revision 1.9 of tree.c (from 1999) added the disabled code and it
is still disabled. Would it be better to remove it?
- Michael
Index: tree.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/bin/ksh/tree.c,v
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -u -r1
