* Claudio Jeker [2011-07-02 00:11]:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:00:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ted Unangst wrote:
> >
> > > Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio? Do they work? Why do we have them,
> > > but not enabled?
> >
> > So it seems like cdnr and rio are dead.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 03:00:09PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ted Unangst wrote:
>
> > Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio? Do they work? Why do we have them,
> > but not enabled?
>
> So it seems like cdnr and rio are dead. Last chance, would anyone like to
> object befor
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Ted Unangst wrote:
> Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio? Do they work? Why do we have them,
> but not enabled?
So it seems like cdnr and rio are dead. Last chance, would anyone like to
object before I start my chainsaw?
Does anybody use altq cdnr or rio? Do they work? Why do we have them,
but not enabled?
The last function commit to cdnr was over 8 years ago, and says it's still
not ready for pf. So that seems really dead. rio may work, but what good
are disabled options?
RIO is documented in options(4),
