On 19/02/18(Mon) 14:00, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.12 15:23:45 +0100:
> > On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
> >
> > Then why not c
Martin Pieuchot(m...@openbsd.org) on 2018.02.12 15:23:45 +0100:
> On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
>
> Then why not change the priority of the default route?
>
> > This might n
On 2018/02/12 15:23, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> > routefilter currently filters the default route,
> > if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
>
> Then why not change the priority of the default route?
On a standard machine this is already
On 12/02/18(Mon) 12:02, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
> routefilter currently filters the default route,
> if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
Then why not change the priority of the default route?
> This might not be a good idea - for example you might want to
> redistribute a default rou
routefilter currently filters the default route,
if it's priority is higher than the filter prio.
This might not be a good idea - for example you might want to
redistribute a default route into ospf, for that you need it in the
routing table but it is configured with a low priority (high value) as
