Hi,
Is there any feedback on this?
Thanks
> > > I tested removing some slop (i.e. structure packing/de-holing) on amd64,
> > > this went through a full kernel + userland build.
> > >
> >
> > Parts of this are probably okay, but there's some stuff which needs better
> > placement vs comments an
> > I tested removing some slop (i.e. structure packing/de-holing) on amd64,
> > this went through a full kernel + userland build.
> >
>
> Parts of this are probably okay, but there's some stuff which needs better
> placement vs comments and at least one move which needs a justification for
> it b
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 4:30 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>
> I tested removing some slop (i.e. structure packing/de-holing) on amd64,
> this went through a full kernel + userland build.
>
Parts of this are probably okay, but there's some stuff which needs better
placement vs comments and at least on
Hi,
I tested removing some slop (i.e. structure packing/de-holing) on amd64, this
went through a full kernel + userland build.
struct proc 20 bytes (6 places) --> 4 bytes (2 places)
struct process 28 bytes (6 places) --> 4 bytes (1 place)
struct vm_map 8 bytes (2 places) --> 0 bytes
Thanks
d