On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:36:53 +
Grumpy wrote:
[...]
> > I'm unsure if we want to throw this into the wild, since this
> > output behaviour is _old_.
>
> That's the point, exactly. People (well, scripts written by people)
> depend on the dd report output format.
>
> > Now, a -h button or simil
> This is going to break atleast 3 scripts that get run periodically
> on all of my development machines, while I'm happy with adjusting
> them (this change would make them smaller actually) I'm unsure if
> we want to throw this into the wild, since this output behaviour
> is _old_.
That's the po
On 2011 Aug 23 (Tue) at 20:48:09 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> This patch makes dd(1) output change from e.g.
>
> $ dd if=/dev/sd0c of=/dev/null bs=512 count=16000
> 16000+0 records in
> 16000+0 records out
> 8192000 bytes transferred in 3.002 secs (2728488 bytes/sec
This patch makes dd(1) output change from e.g.
$ dd if=/dev/sd0c of=/dev/null bs=512 count=16000
16000+0 records in
16000+0 records out
8192000 bytes transferred in 3.002 secs (2728488 bytes/sec)
to
$ obj/dd if=/dev/sd0c of=/dev/null bs=512 count=16000
16000+0 records in
