Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:00:52 +0200 li...@wrant.com
> Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:20:56 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> > On Thu 2016.11.17 at 03:30 +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > > Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:47:49 +0200 li...@wrant.com
> > > > Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:42:42 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> > > > > Hi,
> > > >
Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:20:56 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> On Thu 2016.11.17 at 03:30 +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:47:49 +0200 li...@wrant.com
> > > Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:42:42 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s defa
On Thu 2016.11.17 at 03:30 +0200, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:47:49 +0200 li...@wrant.com
> > Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:42:42 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s default keybindings for
> > > ptrmove actions conflict with emacs u
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:47:49 +0200 li...@wrant.com
> Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:42:42 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> > Hi,
> >
> > mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s default keybindings for
> > ptrmove actions conflict with emacs users' uses, namely all the
> > control-[arrow]
> > bindings that cwm
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:42:42 -0500 Okan Demirmen
> Hi,
>
> mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s default keybindings for
> ptrmove actions conflict with emacs users' uses, namely all the
> control-[arrow]
> bindings that cwm(1) grabs. It has actually been like this since
> keyboard-ba
Hi,
mpi@ recently alerted me to the fact that cwm(1)'s default keybindings for
ptrmove actions conflict with emacs users' uses, namely all the control-[arrow]
bindings that cwm(1) grabs. It has actually been like this since keyboard-based
pointer movements were added, almost exactly 9 years ago. (
